Coca-Cola vs Beef Jerky: Nutrition Comparison
Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more
Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026
Which is Healthier?
Beef Jerky is generally healthier
Beef Jerky comes out ahead in this comparison, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. It has more protein (52g vs 0g), more fiber (0.9g vs 0g), less sugar (9g vs 11g), making it the better choice for most health goals.
Quick Summary
Fewer Calories
Coca-Cola
42 kcal
More Protein
Beef Jerky
52g
More Fiber
Beef Jerky
0.9g
Less Sugar
Beef Jerky
9g
Visual Comparison
Side-by-Side Nutrition Table
| Nutrient | Coca-Cola | Beef Jerky | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 42kcal✓ | 316kcal | -274.0kcal |
| Protein | 0g | 52g✓ | -52.0g |
| Carbohydrates | 11g | 11g | 0.0g |
| Fat | 0g✓ | 8g | -8.0g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0.9g✓ | -0.9g |
| Sugar | 11g | 9g✓ | +2.0g |
| Sodium | 4mg✓ | 2081mg | -2077.0mg |
Serving Size Comparison
All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:
Coca-Cola
Beef Jerky
Diet Compatibility
Coca-Cola
Beef Jerky
When to Choose Coca-Cola
- ✓Lower in calories (42 vs 316)
- ✓Lower in carbs (11g vs 11g)
- ✓Lower sodium (4mg vs 2081mg)
Common Uses
When to Choose Beef Jerky
- ✓Higher in protein (52g vs 0g)
- ✓More fiber (0.9g vs 0g)
- ✓Less sugar (9g vs 11g)
Common Uses
Coca-Cola vs Beef Jerky: Nutritional Analysis
Beef Jerky is more calorie-dense at 316 calories per 100g compared to 42 for Coca-Cola, a difference of 274 calories. On the protein front, Beef Jerky delivers more with 52g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.
Macronutrient Breakdown
The macronutrient profiles of Coca-Cola and Beef Jerky tell different nutritional stories. Coca-Cola provides 11g of carbohydrates, 0g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while Beef Jerky contains 11g carbs, 8g fat, and 0.9g fiber. The higher fiber content in Beef Jerky supports digestive health, helps regulate blood sugar after meals, and contributes to longer-lasting satiety. Sugar content also differs: Coca-Cola contains 11g while Beef Jerky has 9g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.
Key Takeaways
- For weight management: Coca-Cola is the lower-calorie choice at 42 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
- For muscle building: Beef Jerky provides more protein (52g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
- For sustained energy: Beef Jerky offers more fiber (0.9g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
- Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has more calories, Coca-Cola or Beef Jerky?
Beef Jerky has more calories with 316 kcal per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 42 kcal. That's a difference of 274 calories per 100g serving.
Is Coca-Cola healthier than Beef Jerky?
Based on our nutritional analysis, Beef Jerky is generally the healthier choice, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. Beef Jerky has 316 calories, 52g protein, and 0.9g fiber per 100g. However, the best choice depends on your specific dietary goals.
What is the protein difference between Coca-Cola and Beef Jerky?
Beef Jerky has more protein with 52g per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 0g. Beef Jerky provides 52.0g more protein per 100g serving.
Which is better for weight loss, Coca-Cola or Beef Jerky?
For weight loss, Coca-Cola is the better choice with only 42 calories per 100g compared to 316 calories in Beef Jerky. Beef Jerky also offers 0.9g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.
Does Coca-Cola or Beef Jerky have fewer carbs?
Coca-Cola and Beef Jerky have the same carbohydrate content at 11g per 100g.
Related Comparisons
About Our Data
All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.
Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.