Written by CalorieData Nutrition TeamReviewed by a Registered DietitianLast Updated: March 2026

Soda vs MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER: Nutrition Comparison

Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more

Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026

Which is Healthier?

Soda is generally healthier

Soda comes out ahead in this comparison, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. It has fewer calories (41 vs 464), less sugar (11g vs 35.7g), less sodium (4mg vs 304mg)making it the better choice for most health goals.

Quick Summary

Fewer Calories

Soda

41 kcal

More Protein

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

7.14g

More Fiber

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

3.6g

Less Sugar

Soda

11g

Visual Comparison

Caloriesper 100g
Soda
41
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
464
Proteinper 100g
Soda
0g
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
7.14g
Carbohydratesper 100g
Soda
11g
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
57.1g
Fatper 100g
Soda
0g
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
21.4g

Side-by-Side Nutrition Table

NutrientSodaMONSTER COOKIE, MONSTERDifference
Calories41kcal464kcal-423.0kcal
Protein0g7.14g-7.1g
Carbohydrates11g57.1g-46.1g
Fat0g21.4g-21.4g
Fiber0g3.6g-3.6g
Sugar11g35.7g-24.7g
Sodium4mg304mg-300.0mg

Serving Size Comparison

All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:

Soda

Per 100g:41 calories
Per cup (150g):62 calories
Per serving (85g):35 calories

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

Per 100g:464 calories
Per cup (150g):696 calories
Per serving (85g):394 calories

Diet Compatibility

Soda

Low-CalorieVeganVegetarianLow-Sodium

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

VeganVegetarian

When to Choose Soda

  • Lower in calories (41 vs 464)
  • Lower in carbs (11g vs 57.1g)
  • Less sugar (11g vs 35.7g)
  • Lower sodium (4mg vs 304mg)

Common Uses

HydrationMorning ritualSocial occasionsEnergy boost
View full Soda nutrition →

When to Choose MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

  • Higher in protein (7.14g vs 0g)
  • More fiber (3.6g vs 0g)

Common Uses

HydrationMorning ritualSocial occasionsEnergy boost
View full MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER nutrition →

Soda vs MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER: Nutritional Analysis

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER is more calorie-dense at 464 calories per 100g compared to 41 for Soda, a difference of 423 calories. On the protein front, MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER delivers more with 7.14g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.

Macronutrient Breakdown

The macronutrient profiles of Soda and MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER tell different nutritional stories. Soda provides 11g of carbohydrates, 0g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER contains 57.1g carbs, 21.4g fat, and 3.6g fiber. The higher fiber content in MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER supports digestive health, helps regulate blood sugar after meals, and contributes to longer-lasting satiety. Sugar content also differs: Soda contains 11g while MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER has 35.7g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.

Key Takeaways

  • For weight management: Soda is the lower-calorie choice at 41 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
  • For muscle building: MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER provides more protein (7.14g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
  • For sustained energy: MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER offers more fiber (3.6g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
  • Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more calories, Soda or MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER has more calories with 464 kcal per 100g, compared to Soda with 41 kcal. That's a difference of 423 calories per 100g serving.

Is Soda healthier than MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

Based on our nutritional analysis, Soda is generally the healthier choice, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. Soda has 41 calories, 0g protein, and 0g fiber per 100g. However, the best choice depends on your specific dietary goals.

What is the protein difference between Soda and MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER has more protein with 7.14g per 100g, compared to Soda with 0g. MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER provides 7.1g more protein per 100g serving.

Which is better for weight loss, Soda or MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

For weight loss, Soda is the better choice with only 41 calories per 100g compared to 464 calories in MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER. MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER also offers 3.6g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.

Does Soda or MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER have fewer carbs?

Soda has fewer carbs with 11g per 100g, compared to MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER with 57.1g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Soda is the better option with 46.1g fewer carbohydrates.

About Our Data

All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.

Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.