Written by CalorieData Nutrition TeamReviewed by a Registered DietitianLast Updated: March 2026

Wine vs MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER: Nutrition Comparison

Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more

Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026

Which is Healthier?

Wine is generally healthier

Wine comes out ahead in this comparison, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. It has fewer calories (85 vs 464), less sugar (0.6g vs 35.7g), less sodium (5mg vs 304mg)making it the better choice for most health goals.

Quick Summary

Fewer Calories

Wine

85 kcal

More Protein

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

7.14g

More Fiber

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

3.6g

Less Sugar

Wine

0.6g

Visual Comparison

Caloriesper 100g
Wine
85
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
464
Proteinper 100g
Wine
0.1g
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
7.14g
Carbohydratesper 100g
Wine
2.6g
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
57.1g
Fatper 100g
Wine
0g
MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER
21.4g

Side-by-Side Nutrition Table

NutrientWineMONSTER COOKIE, MONSTERDifference
Calories85kcal464kcal-379.0kcal
Protein0.1g7.14g-7.0g
Carbohydrates2.6g57.1g-54.5g
Fat0g21.4g-21.4g
Fiber0g3.6g-3.6g
Sugar0.6g35.7g-35.1g
Sodium5mg304mg-299.0mg

Serving Size Comparison

All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:

Wine

Per 100g:85 calories
Per cup (150g):128 calories
Per serving (85g):72 calories

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

Per 100g:464 calories
Per cup (150g):696 calories
Per serving (85g):394 calories

Diet Compatibility

Wine

Low-CarbLow-CalorieVeganVegetarianLow-Sodium

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

VeganVegetarian

When to Choose Wine

  • Lower in calories (85 vs 464)
  • Lower in carbs (2.6g vs 57.1g)
  • Less sugar (0.6g vs 35.7g)
  • Lower sodium (5mg vs 304mg)

Common Uses

HydrationMorning ritualSocial occasionsEnergy boost
View full Wine nutrition →

When to Choose MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER

  • Higher in protein (7.14g vs 0.1g)
  • More fiber (3.6g vs 0g)

Common Uses

HydrationMorning ritualSocial occasionsEnergy boost
View full MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER nutrition →

Wine vs MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER: Nutritional Analysis

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER is more calorie-dense at 464 calories per 100g compared to 85 for Wine, a difference of 379 calories. On the protein front, MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER delivers more with 7.14g per 100g versus 0.1g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.

Macronutrient Breakdown

The macronutrient profiles of Wine and MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER tell different nutritional stories. Wine provides 2.6g of carbohydrates, 0g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER contains 57.1g carbs, 21.4g fat, and 3.6g fiber. The higher fiber content in MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER supports digestive health, helps regulate blood sugar after meals, and contributes to longer-lasting satiety. Sugar content also differs: Wine contains 0.6g while MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER has 35.7g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.

Key Takeaways

  • For weight management: Wine is the lower-calorie choice at 85 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
  • For muscle building: MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER provides more protein (7.14g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
  • For sustained energy: MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER offers more fiber (3.6g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
  • Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more calories, Wine or MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER has more calories with 464 kcal per 100g, compared to Wine with 85 kcal. That's a difference of 379 calories per 100g serving.

Is Wine healthier than MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

Based on our nutritional analysis, Wine is generally the healthier choice, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. Wine has 85 calories, 0.1g protein, and 0g fiber per 100g. However, the best choice depends on your specific dietary goals.

What is the protein difference between Wine and MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER has more protein with 7.14g per 100g, compared to Wine with 0.1g. MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER provides 7.0g more protein per 100g serving.

Which is better for weight loss, Wine or MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER?

For weight loss, Wine is the better choice with only 85 calories per 100g compared to 464 calories in MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER. MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER also offers 3.6g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.

Does Wine or MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER have fewer carbs?

Wine has fewer carbs with 2.6g per 100g, compared to MONSTER COOKIE, MONSTER with 57.1g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Wine is the better option with 54.5g fewer carbohydrates.

About Our Data

All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.

Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.