Chickpeas vs Kombucha: Nutrition Comparison
Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more
Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026
Which is Healthier?
Kombucha is generally healthier
Kombucha comes out ahead in this comparison, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. It has fewer calories (17 vs 164), less sugar (3g vs 4.8g), less sodium (5mg vs 7mg)making it the better choice for most health goals.
Quick Summary
Fewer Calories
Kombucha
17 kcal
More Protein
Chickpeas
8.9g
More Fiber
Chickpeas
7.6g
Less Sugar
Kombucha
3g
Visual Comparison
Side-by-Side Nutrition Table
Serving Size Comparison
All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:
Chickpeas
Kombucha
Diet Compatibility
Chickpeas
Kombucha
When to Choose Chickpeas
- ✓Higher in protein (8.9g vs 0g)
- ✓More fiber (7.6g vs 0g)
Common Uses
When to Choose Kombucha
- ✓Lower in calories (17 vs 164)
- ✓Lower in carbs (4.5g vs 27g)
- ✓Less sugar (3g vs 4.8g)
- ✓Lower sodium (5mg vs 7mg)
Common Uses
Chickpeas vs Kombucha: Nutritional Analysis
Chickpeas is more calorie-dense at 164 calories per 100g compared to 17 for Kombucha, a difference of 147 calories. On the protein front, Chickpeas delivers more with 8.9g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.
Macronutrient Breakdown
The macronutrient profiles of Chickpeas and Kombucha tell different nutritional stories. Chickpeas provides 27g of carbohydrates, 2.6g of fat, and 7.6g of fiber per 100g, while Kombucha contains 4.5g carbs, 0g fat, and 0g fiber. The higher fiber content in Chickpeas supports digestive health, helps regulate blood sugar after meals, and contributes to longer-lasting satiety. Sugar content also differs: Chickpeas contains 4.8g while Kombucha has 3g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.
Key Takeaways
- For weight management: Kombucha is the lower-calorie choice at 17 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
- For muscle building: Chickpeas provides more protein (8.9g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
- For sustained energy: Chickpeas offers more fiber (7.6g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
- Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has more calories, Chickpeas or Kombucha?
Chickpeas has more calories with 164 kcal per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 17 kcal. That's a difference of 147 calories per 100g serving.
Is Chickpeas healthier than Kombucha?
Based on our nutritional analysis, Kombucha is generally the healthier choice, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. Kombucha has 17 calories, 0g protein, and 0g fiber per 100g. However, the best choice depends on your specific dietary goals.
What is the protein difference between Chickpeas and Kombucha?
Chickpeas has more protein with 8.9g per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 0g. Chickpeas provides 8.9g more protein per 100g serving.
Which is better for weight loss, Chickpeas or Kombucha?
For weight loss, Kombucha is the better choice with only 17 calories per 100g compared to 164 calories in Chickpeas. Chickpeas also offers 7.6g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.
Does Chickpeas or Kombucha have fewer carbs?
Kombucha has fewer carbs with 4.5g per 100g, compared to Chickpeas with 27g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Kombucha is the better option with 22.5g fewer carbohydrates.
Related Comparisons
About Our Data
All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.
Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.