Written by CalorieData Nutrition TeamReviewed by a Registered DietitianLast Updated: March 2026

Coca-Cola vs Pork Chop: Nutrition Comparison

Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more

Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026

Which is Healthier?

Both foods have similar nutritional profiles

Both foods have similar nutritional profiles with each winning in different categories. Your choice should depend on your specific dietary goals and preferences. Coca-Cola has 42 calories while Pork Chop has 242 calories per 100g.

Quick Summary

Fewer Calories

Coca-Cola

42 kcal

More Protein

Pork Chop

27g

More Fiber

Coca-Cola

0g

Less Sugar

Pork Chop

0g

Visual Comparison

Caloriesper 100g
Coca-Cola
42
Pork Chop
242
Proteinper 100g
Coca-Cola
0g
Pork Chop
27g
Carbohydratesper 100g
Coca-Cola
11g
Pork Chop
0g
Fatper 100g
Coca-Cola
0g
Pork Chop
14g

Side-by-Side Nutrition Table

NutrientCoca-ColaPork ChopDifference
Calories42kcal242kcal-200.0kcal
Protein0g27g-27.0g
Carbohydrates11g0g+11.0g
Fat0g14g-14.0g
Fiber0g0g0.0g
Sugar11g0g+11.0g
Sodium4mg75mg-71.0mg

Serving Size Comparison

All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:

Coca-Cola

Per 100g:42 calories
Per cup (150g):63 calories
Per serving (85g):36 calories

Pork Chop

Per 100g:242 calories
Per cup (150g):363 calories
Per serving (85g):206 calories

Diet Compatibility

Coca-Cola

Low-CalorieVeganVegetarianLow-Sodium

Pork Chop

KetoLow-CarbHigh-ProteinPaleoLow-Sodium

When to Choose Coca-Cola

  • Lower in calories (42 vs 242)
  • More fiber (0g vs 0g)
  • Lower sodium (4mg vs 75mg)

Common Uses

HydrationMorning ritualSocial occasionsEnergy boost
View full Coca-Cola nutrition →

When to Choose Pork Chop

  • Higher in protein (27g vs 0g)
  • Lower in carbs (0g vs 11g)
  • Less sugar (0g vs 11g)

Common Uses

Main dishesMeal prepGrillingHigh-protein meals
View full Pork Chop nutrition →

Coca-Cola vs Pork Chop: Nutritional Analysis

Pork Chop is more calorie-dense at 242 calories per 100g compared to 42 for Coca-Cola, a difference of 200 calories. On the protein front, Pork Chop delivers more with 27g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.

Macronutrient Breakdown

The macronutrient profiles of Coca-Cola and Pork Chop tell different nutritional stories. Coca-Cola provides 11g of carbohydrates, 0g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while Pork Chop contains 0g carbs, 14g fat, and 0g fiber. Sugar content also differs: Coca-Cola contains 11g while Pork Chop has 0g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.

Key Takeaways

  • For weight management: Coca-Cola is the lower-calorie choice at 42 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
  • For muscle building: Pork Chop provides more protein (27g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
  • For sustained energy: Coca-Cola offers more fiber (0g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
  • Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more calories, Coca-Cola or Pork Chop?

Pork Chop has more calories with 242 kcal per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 42 kcal. That's a difference of 200 calories per 100g serving.

Is Coca-Cola healthier than Pork Chop?

Coca-Cola and Pork Chop have similar nutritional profiles, with each food winning in different categories. The healthier choice depends on your specific dietary goals and nutritional needs.

What is the protein difference between Coca-Cola and Pork Chop?

Pork Chop has more protein with 27g per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 0g. Pork Chop provides 27.0g more protein per 100g serving.

Which is better for weight loss, Coca-Cola or Pork Chop?

For weight loss, Coca-Cola is the better choice with only 42 calories per 100g compared to 242 calories in Pork Chop. Pork Chop also offers 0g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.

Does Coca-Cola or Pork Chop have fewer carbs?

Pork Chop has fewer carbs with 0g per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 11g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Pork Chop is the better option with 11.0g fewer carbohydrates.

About Our Data

All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.

Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.