Ground Beef vs Kombucha: Nutrition Comparison
Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more
Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026
Which is Healthier?
Both foods have similar nutritional profiles
Both foods have similar nutritional profiles with each winning in different categories. Your choice should depend on your specific dietary goals and preferences. Ground Beef has 250 calories while Kombucha has 17 calories per 100g.
Quick Summary
Fewer Calories
Kombucha
17 kcal
More Protein
Ground Beef
26g
More Fiber
Ground Beef
0g
Less Sugar
Ground Beef
0g
Visual Comparison
Side-by-Side Nutrition Table
| Nutrient | Ground Beef | Kombucha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250kcal | 17kcal✓ | +233.0kcal |
| Protein | 26g✓ | 0g | +26.0g |
| Carbohydrates | 0g✓ | 4.5g | -4.5g |
| Fat | 17g | 0g✓ | +17.0g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | 0.0g |
| Sugar | 0g✓ | 3g | -3.0g |
| Sodium | 75mg | 5mg✓ | +70.0mg |
Serving Size Comparison
All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:
Ground Beef
Kombucha
Diet Compatibility
Ground Beef
Kombucha
When to Choose Ground Beef
- ✓Higher in protein (26g vs 0g)
- ✓More fiber (0g vs 0g)
- ✓Lower in carbs (0g vs 4.5g)
- ✓Less sugar (0g vs 3g)
Common Uses
When to Choose Kombucha
- ✓Lower in calories (17 vs 250)
- ✓Lower sodium (5mg vs 75mg)
Common Uses
Ground Beef vs Kombucha: Nutritional Analysis
Ground Beef is more calorie-dense at 250 calories per 100g compared to 17 for Kombucha, a difference of 233 calories. On the protein front, Ground Beef delivers more with 26g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.
Macronutrient Breakdown
The macronutrient profiles of Ground Beef and Kombucha tell different nutritional stories. Ground Beef provides 0g of carbohydrates, 17g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while Kombucha contains 4.5g carbs, 0g fat, and 0g fiber. Sugar content also differs: Ground Beef contains 0g while Kombucha has 3g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.
Key Takeaways
- For weight management: Kombucha is the lower-calorie choice at 17 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
- For muscle building: Ground Beef provides more protein (26g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
- For sustained energy: Ground Beef offers more fiber (0g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
- Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has more calories, Ground Beef or Kombucha?
Ground Beef has more calories with 250 kcal per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 17 kcal. That's a difference of 233 calories per 100g serving.
Is Ground Beef healthier than Kombucha?
Ground Beef and Kombucha have similar nutritional profiles, with each food winning in different categories. The healthier choice depends on your specific dietary goals and nutritional needs.
What is the protein difference between Ground Beef and Kombucha?
Ground Beef has more protein with 26g per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 0g. Ground Beef provides 26.0g more protein per 100g serving.
Which is better for weight loss, Ground Beef or Kombucha?
For weight loss, Kombucha is the better choice with only 17 calories per 100g compared to 250 calories in Ground Beef. Kombucha also offers 0g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.
Does Ground Beef or Kombucha have fewer carbs?
Ground Beef has fewer carbs with 0g per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 4.5g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Ground Beef is the better option with 4.5g fewer carbohydrates.
Related Comparisons
About Our Data
All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.
Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.