Ham vs Coca-Cola: Nutrition Comparison
Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more
Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026
Which is Healthier?
Both foods have similar nutritional profiles
Both foods have similar nutritional profiles with each winning in different categories. Your choice should depend on your specific dietary goals and preferences. Ham has 145 calories while Coca-Cola has 42 calories per 100g.
Quick Summary
Fewer Calories
Coca-Cola
42 kcal
More Protein
Ham
21g
More Fiber
Ham
0g
Less Sugar
Ham
1.5g
Visual Comparison
Side-by-Side Nutrition Table
Serving Size Comparison
All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:
Ham
Coca-Cola
Diet Compatibility
Ham
Coca-Cola
When to Choose Ham
- ✓Higher in protein (21g vs 0g)
- ✓More fiber (0g vs 0g)
- ✓Lower in carbs (1.5g vs 11g)
- ✓Less sugar (1.5g vs 11g)
Common Uses
When to Choose Coca-Cola
- ✓Lower in calories (42 vs 145)
- ✓Lower sodium (4mg vs 1203mg)
Common Uses
Ham vs Coca-Cola: Nutritional Analysis
Ham is more calorie-dense at 145 calories per 100g compared to 42 for Coca-Cola, a difference of 103 calories. On the protein front, Ham delivers more with 21g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.
Macronutrient Breakdown
The macronutrient profiles of Ham and Coca-Cola tell different nutritional stories. Ham provides 1.5g of carbohydrates, 6g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while Coca-Cola contains 11g carbs, 0g fat, and 0g fiber. Sugar content also differs: Ham contains 1.5g while Coca-Cola has 11g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.
Key Takeaways
- For weight management: Coca-Cola is the lower-calorie choice at 42 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
- For muscle building: Ham provides more protein (21g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
- For sustained energy: Ham offers more fiber (0g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
- Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has more calories, Ham or Coca-Cola?
Ham has more calories with 145 kcal per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 42 kcal. That's a difference of 103 calories per 100g serving.
Is Ham healthier than Coca-Cola?
Ham and Coca-Cola have similar nutritional profiles, with each food winning in different categories. The healthier choice depends on your specific dietary goals and nutritional needs.
What is the protein difference between Ham and Coca-Cola?
Ham has more protein with 21g per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 0g. Ham provides 21.0g more protein per 100g serving.
Which is better for weight loss, Ham or Coca-Cola?
For weight loss, Coca-Cola is the better choice with only 42 calories per 100g compared to 145 calories in Ham. Coca-Cola also offers 0g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.
Does Ham or Coca-Cola have fewer carbs?
Ham has fewer carbs with 1.5g per 100g, compared to Coca-Cola with 11g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Ham is the better option with 9.5g fewer carbohydrates.
Related Comparisons
About Our Data
All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.
Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.