Cod vs Kombucha: Nutrition Comparison
Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more
Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026
Which is Healthier?
Both foods have similar nutritional profiles
Both foods have similar nutritional profiles with each winning in different categories. Your choice should depend on your specific dietary goals and preferences. Cod has 82 calories while Kombucha has 17 calories per 100g.
Quick Summary
Fewer Calories
Kombucha
17 kcal
More Protein
Cod
17g
More Fiber
Cod
0g
Less Sugar
Cod
0g
Visual Comparison
Side-by-Side Nutrition Table
Serving Size Comparison
All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:
Cod
Kombucha
Diet Compatibility
Cod
Kombucha
When to Choose Cod
- ✓Higher in protein (17g vs 0g)
- ✓More fiber (0g vs 0g)
- ✓Lower in carbs (0g vs 4.5g)
- ✓Less sugar (0g vs 3g)
Common Uses
When to Choose Kombucha
- ✓Lower in calories (17 vs 82)
- ✓Lower sodium (5mg vs 77mg)
Common Uses
Cod vs Kombucha: Nutritional Analysis
Cod is more calorie-dense at 82 calories per 100g compared to 17 for Kombucha, a difference of 65 calories. On the protein front, Cod delivers more with 17g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.
Macronutrient Breakdown
The macronutrient profiles of Cod and Kombucha tell different nutritional stories. Cod provides 0g of carbohydrates, 0.7g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while Kombucha contains 4.5g carbs, 0g fat, and 0g fiber. Sugar content also differs: Cod contains 0g while Kombucha has 3g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.
Key Takeaways
- For weight management: Kombucha is the lower-calorie choice at 17 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
- For muscle building: Cod provides more protein (17g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
- For sustained energy: Cod offers more fiber (0g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
- Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has more calories, Cod or Kombucha?
Cod has more calories with 82 kcal per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 17 kcal. That's a difference of 65 calories per 100g serving.
Is Cod healthier than Kombucha?
Cod and Kombucha have similar nutritional profiles, with each food winning in different categories. The healthier choice depends on your specific dietary goals and nutritional needs.
What is the protein difference between Cod and Kombucha?
Cod has more protein with 17g per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 0g. Cod provides 17.0g more protein per 100g serving.
Which is better for weight loss, Cod or Kombucha?
For weight loss, Kombucha is the better choice with only 17 calories per 100g compared to 82 calories in Cod. Kombucha also offers 0g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.
Does Cod or Kombucha have fewer carbs?
Cod has fewer carbs with 0g per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 4.5g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Cod is the better option with 4.5g fewer carbohydrates.
Related Comparisons
About Our Data
All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.
Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.