Written by CalorieData Nutrition TeamReviewed by a Registered DietitianLast Updated: March 2026

Milk vs Kombucha: Nutrition Comparison

Which is healthier? Compare calories, protein, carbs, and more

Complete side-by-side nutrition comparison per 100g serving | Updated 2026

Which is Healthier?

Kombucha is generally healthier

Kombucha comes out ahead in this comparison, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. It has fewer calories (17 vs 61), less sugar (3g vs 4.8g), less sodium (5mg vs 44mg)making it the better choice for most health goals.

Quick Summary

Fewer Calories

Kombucha

17 kcal

More Protein

Milk

3.2g

More Fiber

Milk

0g

Less Sugar

Kombucha

3g

Visual Comparison

Caloriesper 100g
Milk
61
Kombucha
17
Proteinper 100g
Milk
3.2g
Kombucha
0g
Carbohydratesper 100g
Milk
4.8g
Kombucha
4.5g
Fatper 100g
Milk
3.3g
Kombucha
0g

Side-by-Side Nutrition Table

NutrientMilkKombuchaDifference
Calories61kcal17kcal+44.0kcal
Protein3.2g0g+3.2g
Carbohydrates4.8g4.5g+0.3g
Fat3.3g0g+3.3g
Fiber0g0g0.0g
Sugar4.8g3g+1.8g
Sodium44mg5mg+39.0mg

Serving Size Comparison

All values above are per 100g. Here's how they compare in common serving sizes:

Milk

Per 100g:61 calories
Per cup (150g):92 calories
Per serving (85g):52 calories

Kombucha

Per 100g:17 calories
Per cup (150g):26 calories
Per serving (85g):14 calories

Diet Compatibility

Milk

Low-CarbLow-CalorieVegetarianLow-Sodium

Kombucha

Low-CarbLow-CalorieVeganVegetarianLow-Sodium

When to Choose Milk

  • Higher in protein (3.2g vs 0g)
  • More fiber (0g vs 0g)

Common Uses

BreakfastSnacksCooking ingredientPost-workout
View full Milk nutrition →

When to Choose Kombucha

  • Lower in calories (17 vs 61)
  • Lower in carbs (4.5g vs 4.8g)
  • Less sugar (3g vs 4.8g)
  • Lower sodium (5mg vs 44mg)

Common Uses

HydrationMorning ritualSocial occasionsEnergy boost
View full Kombucha nutrition →

Milk vs Kombucha: Nutritional Analysis

Milk is more calorie-dense at 61 calories per 100g compared to 17 for Kombucha, a difference of 44 calories. On the protein front, Milk delivers more with 3.2g per 100g versus 0g, which matters for muscle maintenance, satiety, and overall metabolic health. These differences become meaningful when you consider how each food fits into your daily dietary pattern rather than looking at any single nutrient in isolation.

Macronutrient Breakdown

The macronutrient profiles of Milk and Kombucha tell different nutritional stories. Milk provides 4.8g of carbohydrates, 3.3g of fat, and 0g of fiber per 100g, while Kombucha contains 4.5g carbs, 0g fat, and 0g fiber. Sugar content also differs: Milk contains 4.8g while Kombucha has 3g per 100g. Lower sugar options are generally preferable for blood sugar management and dental health.

Key Takeaways

  • For weight management: Kombucha is the lower-calorie choice at 17 cal/100g, making it more suitable for calorie-controlled diets.
  • For muscle building: Milk provides more protein (3.2g/100g), supporting muscle repair and growth.
  • For sustained energy: Milk offers more fiber (0g/100g), which slows digestion and provides steadier energy release.
  • Overall: Neither food is universally "better" than the other. The right choice depends on your specific nutritional goals, meal context, and dietary preferences. Both can play a role in a balanced diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more calories, Milk or Kombucha?

Milk has more calories with 61 kcal per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 17 kcal. That's a difference of 44 calories per 100g serving.

Is Milk healthier than Kombucha?

Based on our nutritional analysis, Kombucha is generally the healthier choice, winning in 3 out of 5 key nutritional categories. Kombucha has 17 calories, 0g protein, and 0g fiber per 100g. However, the best choice depends on your specific dietary goals.

What is the protein difference between Milk and Kombucha?

Milk has more protein with 3.2g per 100g, compared to Kombucha with 0g. Milk provides 3.2g more protein per 100g serving.

Which is better for weight loss, Milk or Kombucha?

For weight loss, Kombucha is the better choice with only 17 calories per 100g compared to 61 calories in Milk. Kombucha also offers 0g of fiber per 100g, which helps you feel fuller longer.

Does Milk or Kombucha have fewer carbs?

Kombucha has fewer carbs with 4.5g per 100g, compared to Milk with 4.8g. If you're following a low-carb diet, Kombucha is the better option with 0.3g fewer carbohydrates.

About Our Data

All nutrition data in this comparison is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central, the official food composition database maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Values are based on 100g servings for accurate comparison.

Health Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or dietary advice. Nutritional needs vary by individual. The best food choice depends on your personal health goals, dietary requirements, and preferences. Consult a healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized nutrition guidance.